Microneedling: a powerful, under-researched hair loss therapy
In the last five years, microneedling therapies have exploded in popularity – especially among hair loss sufferers.
Research now shows that microneedling can increase hair counts by 15%. And as clinical evidence for microneedling continues to grow, so do the devices available to consumers: microneedle rollers, microneedle stamps, and even automated needling devices – with needle lengths ranging from 0.25mm to 2.5mm (and higher).
But with microneedling research still in its infancy, there’s one big question that researchers have yet to answer:
When it comes to treating pattern hair loss, what’s the best microneedling needle length? 0.25mm? 0.5mm? 1.0mm? 1.5mm? 2.0mm? Higher?
Despite what microneedling manufacturers tell you, there is no clear-cut answer.
Rather, the evidence indicates that when it comes to treating pattern hair loss, the right microneedling needle length is highly contextual. It depends on (1) how frequently you plan on microneedling and (2) whether you’re combining microneedling with other treatments.
This article dives into the research to uncover the evidence, and how to best position yourself for hair regrowth if you decide to start microneedling.
What is microneedling?
Microneedling is a stimulation-based therapy for hair loss. Similar to platelet-rich plasma therapy and massaging, microneedling leverages acute wounding in balding scalp skin (via medical-grade needles) to evoke growth factors. Over time, these growth factors help to (1) promote the formation of new blood vessels, (2) reduce the appearance of scar tissue, and (3) promote hair follicle proliferation.
Yes, the therapy hurts. And yes, microneedlers look like small medieval torture devices.
A microneedle roller used for hair loss
But despite the pain involved in therapy, microneedling – when repeated once or twice-weekly, and for 3-6 months – have been shown to greatly improve hair growth in men with androgenic alopecia (AGA).
Just see the results of this 2017 study, which demonstrated hair count improvements of ~15% for those using microneedling devices without any other treatments. (1)
Microneedling for AGA: results over six months (bi-weekly sessions)
Or the results of this 2013 study, which found that microneedling enhanced the regrowth achieved from 5% minoxidil by 400%. (2)
Microneedling + 5% minoxidil for AGA: results over three months (weekly sessions)
In short: microneedling is effective at improving pattern hair loss (AGA) in men. But questions still remain as to its best practices. Questions like:
- How far apart should we space our sessions? Daily? Weekly? Monthly?
- How long should our sessions be? Five minutes? Ten? Twenty?
- What’s the best needle count? 192 needles? 540 needles? More?
- What’s the best needle length? 0.25 mm? 1.0 mm? 2.0 mm? More?
…and many more.
The truth is that it’s impossible to answer any one of these questions without answering the others. After all, these questions are all interlinked. The smaller the needle length, the quicker your healing, the more frequently you can microneedle. And the higher your number of needles, the more inflammation you can evoke, and the shorter your sessions can be.
Having said that, the best needle length debate might be answerable by itself. Why? Because at different needle lengths, microneedling has different effects.
Microneedling needle lengths: different puncture depths, different effects on the hair follicles
Our scalp skin consists of three main layers: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis (i.e., subcutaneous layer).
The thickness of our scalp (and its subcomponents) is influenced by our age, gender, and degree of balding (3). But in general, our scalp skin is just 5mm to 6mm thick.
Within that skin, our epidermis is usually less than 0.5mm thick, our dermis is 1-2mm thick, and our subcutaneous layer is 3mm thick.
This has significant relevance to microneedling needle lengths. Why? Because the depths at which these needles puncture our scalps has a direct influence over which regions of the hair follicles we will stimulate.
Needle lengths of 0.25 mm to 0.5 mm improve topical absorption
At shorter needle depths (i.e., 0.25mm to 0.5mm), microneedling only wounds the top layers of the skin (the epidermis). This will improve the absorption of topicals (i.e., minoxidil). However, these shallower depths likely won’t evoke the growth factors necessary to encourage hair follicle proliferation. For this effect to occur, we need to incur wounds deeper – specifically, we need to wound the dermis.
Needle lengths of 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm evoke growth factors for hair follicle proliferation
At longer needle depths (i.e., 1.5mm to 2.5mm), microneedling needles will puncture the dermis of our scalp skin. This has important ramifications to hair follicle proliferation, because the dermis is where the hair follicle stem cell bulge resides.
What is the hair follicle stem cell bulge?
The hair follicle stem cell bulge is located near the isthmus (upper third) of the hair follicle – and can usually be found at the base of the arrector pili muscle.
This hair follicle stem cell bulge is sort of like the “source material” for a hair follicle. These stem cells help replenish and repopulate the cells that constitute each hair follicle. If a hair follicle’s stem cell population is completely depleted, hair follicles can no longer replace old cells, and the hair follicles will stop proliferating (or growing).
Hair follicle stem cell bulge
Interestingly, we can stimulate these stem cells via wounding (4). If wounds are incurred surrounding these stem cell bulges, the growth factors stimulated during wounding can even signal to these hair follicle stem cells to initiate a new anagen phase of the hair cycle.
For pattern hair loss sufferers, this often means increases to hair counts within the realms of 15% – and that’s without any other therapies. That’s an impressive improvement. But again, it bears repeating…
We only see these hair count increases from studies using microneedling devices that puncture 1.5mm to 2.5mm deep. In other words, we only see these hair count increases at microneedling lengths that stimulate the hair follicle stem cell bulge.
Long-story short: we likely need to microneedle at depths of 1.5mm to 2.5mm if we’re to expect appreciable stimulation of the hair follicle stem cell bulge, and thereby appreciable hair follicle proliferation (i.e., hair regrowth).
So, should we all microneedling at needle lengths of 1.5mm or greater?
When it comes to needle depths, there is an upper limit. Specifically, we want to avoid puncturing something called an emissary vein.
Emissary veins are bi-directional blood vessels that run from the scalp’s hypodermis (i.e., muscle tissues) through the cranium (i.e., skull bone) and into the brain. When brain infections occur following scalp injuries, they are almost always the result of a puncture to the emissary vein – as an open emissary vein can allow pathogenic bacteria from the epidermis to bypass the skull plate and migrate directly into brain tissues. This can cause serious health ramifications, and even death.
Emissary veins aren’t everywhere on the scalp. And in general, they’re located at depths deeper than 5mm – at the bottom edges of the hypodermis.
There’s no reason for us to risk wounding an emissary vein via microneedling – especially because we can stimulate the hair follicle stem cell bulge at shallower depths (i.e., 1.5 mm to 2.5 mm).
Moreover, the studies that we do have on microneedling for pattern hair loss never went above 2.5mm. So, don’t deviate from what is clinically supported; don’t go deeper than needle lengths of 2.5mm.
So, now that we’ve established a lower and upper limit for mironeedling needle lengths, let’s revisit that question: which needle length is best for regrowing hair?
Microneedling for hair growth: what’s the best needle length?
Since microneedling research is still in its infancy, we don’t yet know the best needle length. But we can give you a general idea of the best needle lengths based on the clinical studies on microneedling published so far.
- In this 2013 study, participants used 5% minoxidil twice-daily alongside microneedling with a 1.5mm needle roller once-weekly. Over three months, the author (Dr. Dhurat) found that the 1.5mm needle roller improved hair regrowth from minoxidil by 400%. (2)
- In this 2015 study, participants used minoxidil and finasteride daily alongside microneedling with a 1.5mm needler roller either once-weekly or twice-weekly. After six months, the researchers found significant increases to hair counts. (5)
- In this 2017 study, participants used 5% minoxidil alongside a 1.5mm to 2.5mm automated needler once every two weeks. Over six months, the investigators found comparable hair count increases to that of Dr. Dhurat’s 2013 study. They also found that microneedling alone improved hair counts by ~15%. (1)
These are the only studies we have on microneedling for pattern hair loss. So, what do they tell us?
- So far, we’ve only clinically tested microneedle lengths of 1.5mm to 2.5mm for men with androgenic alopecia (AGA).
- At depths of 1.5mm to 2.5mm, microneedling seems to increase both topical absorption (with minoxidil) and hair follicle proliferation (as a standalone treatment).
The bottom line: stick with a 1.5mm to 2.5mm needle length. Why? It’s clinically effective, it increases both topical absorption and hair follicle proliferation, and it’s short enough to avoid puncturing an emissary vein.
Moreover, stick with needling once weekly, or once every two weeks. Again, it’s clinically effective. Other recommendations on other websites are theoretical, anecdotal, and generally unsubstantiated.
What about microneedling every day with a 0.25 mm or 0.5 mm needle length?
Before we go further, it’s important to note that the absence of evidence does not imply evidence against any treatment protocol.
In other words, just because we don’t have studies trialing needle lengths smaller than 1.5mm for pattern hair loss, this does not mean that smaller needle lengths are ineffective. It’s just that evidence supporting smaller needle lengths is unsubstantiated.
There are some YouTube personalities claiming to see great microneedling results from microneedling nightly with a 0.25mm and then immediately applying topicals. There are some men on HairLossTalk who are demonstrating results from microneedling every night with a 1.0mm roller.
There may be some benefits to microneedling more frequently – particularly if you’re also using a topical. For example, due to the relatively short half-life of topical minoxidil, users must apply minoxidil twice-daily in order to elicit a significant effect on miniaturizing hair follicles. Microneedlers with needle lengths of 0.25mm to 0.5mm help to increase topical absorption. Moreover, because these needle lengths typically only puncture the epidermis, they can be used more frequently (i.e., once daily) versus microneedlers with needle lengths of 1.5mm+ (i.e., once every week or more).
Thus, some might argue that daily microneedling with a smaller needle length might help to more regularly promote topical absorption, and that this benefit might outweigh the stimulation of growth factors elicited from needle depths of 1.5mm and beyond.
But again, these stories are just anecdotes; and the rationales behind shorter needle lengths and more frequent needling are just hypothetical. While we do have people trialing augmented microneedling lengths and schedules in our membership community (with great success), we can’t yet extrapolate their results to what all pattern hair loss sufferers should expect.
Long story short: until these anecdotes stand the test of a clinical trial, we must make our recommendations based on the evidence already available… and that means recommending a 1.5mm to 2.5mm needle length.
The bottom line: for now, stick with a 1.5mm to 2.5mm needle length
This needle length is what worked in clinical trials, and it seems to also be working well for the people inside of our membership site.
Questions? Comments? Please reach out in the comments section.
Rob English is a researcher, medical editor, and the founder of perfecthairhealth.com. He acts as a peer reviewer for scholarly journals and has published two peer-reviewed papers on androgenic alopecia. He writes regularly about the science behind hair loss (and hair growth). Feel free to browse his long-form articles and publications throughout this site.